lör 2006-06-24 klockan 15:47 -0700 skrev Merton Campbell Crockett: > My understanding is that a server receiving an HTTP/1.0 request is > supposed to respond using the same version of the protocol. No, a server should respond with the highest protocol version it supports. But there is some features in HTTP/1.1 it MUST NOT use if the request was a HTTP/1.0 request. > As you might gather, the problem involves authentication. In this > specific instance, IE users should authenticate using NTLM > authentication while users of other browsers should use basic > authentication. What occurs, in practice, is that IE users that are > in the Active Directory domain receive a 401.2 status while Firefox > users and IE users whose system is not logged into or known to the > Active Directory domain are prompted to provide their authentication > credentials. NTLM can not be proxied by Squid-2.5 due to the ways Microsoft twisted the HTTP protocol when slabbing their connection oriented NTLM authentication method ontop of the message based HTTP protocol.. > The other part of the question is what does Squid do when it receives > an HTTP/1.1 response to its HTTP/1.0 request? What it should, responds to it's clients with a HTTP/1.0 response. Regards Henrik
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Detta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E4r?= en digitalt signerad meddelandedel
