Hi,
I'm tuning a large squid cluster reverse-proxy implementation, and
I'm wondering what the experienced opinions are about the number of
async io threads for 28 cache_dirs?
Some background on the testing cluster so far (spare hardware similar
from my other production systems):
host machines:
3x dual xeon 3.0GHz E em64t 12GB RAM
2x quad opteron 248 32GB RAM
all broadcom bcm5704 dual Gbit NICs
storage:
each system = lsi megaraid320-2 (2ch ultra320), 2x dell powervault
220s, 14x 36gb 15k SCSI per powervault
5 systems in total. I've been trying different replacement policies,
refresh_patterns, tuned the kernel's network params, memory sizes,
etc. They're all running with async writes turned on.
It seems like I'm getting throughput of 500req/s at 100% IO load on
the RAIDed systems. This is with a ~55% hit rate (very large library
size). Each request is on avg 8kB with deviations of about 4kB +/-.
I'd like to see how much I can get out of squid... I'm getting a
NetCache unit in for an eval, so I can do some comparison.
SO - the Question - For storage, I've been doing dual 2 RAID10 (7x2)
logical drives, limiting the used space to 20GB each, but for this
experiment I'm trying out configuring it with 28 individual drives at
2GB cache_dirs each. For the RAID setup, 32 threads seemed to work
the smoothest (compared to 26 and 40). Currently, the 28 drive system
is running with 512 threads :o -- is this too much? I tried 64
previously and squid kept reporting IO overloading, pausing way too
often to sync. I could just try everything, but it takes a while to
get some comprehensive data (memory cache needs to fill up, etc).
Thanks in advance,
Aaron Chu
