lör 2006-05-20 klockan 13:16 +0100 skrev Ralph Corderoy: > Hi Mark, > > > > $ squidclient http://www.housepricecrash.co.uk/scripts/javascript/global.js | > > > > http://www.web-caching.com/cacheability.html > > Thanks, I'm having a look at it now. It appears broken however since it > thinks "The following server's clock appears to be inaccurate" for any > URL I throw at it, i.e. it's probably wrong, not the rest of the world. There is other sites providing the same tool. Home page: http://www.mnot.net/cacheability/ The ircache mirror runs with a correct clock.. > * http://www.housepricecrash.co.uk/scripts/javascript/global.js > Date Sat, 20 May 2006 12:14:18 GMT > Expires - > Cache-Control - > Last-Modified - > ETag - > Content-Length 0.5K (545) > Server Apache/2.0.53 (Fedora) > > This object will be considered stale, because it doesn't have any > freshness information assigned. It doesn't have a validator present. Which is true and why it doesn't get cached. The clock issue is not relevant under these conditions.. Regards Henrik
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Detta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E4r?= en digitalt signerad meddelandedel
