tor 2006-05-11 klockan 23:05 -0400 skrev Steve Snyder: > On Squid 2.5S13, using ufs/aufs, I am using the recommended 256 L2 cache > directories. I find though that I never use more than about 140 of them. > That is, roughly 115 of every 256 directories are untouched since the > initial creation of the cache directory hierarchy. ??? Squid fills the directory in numeric order, so all L2 directories in your active L1 directories should be used. L1/L2/filenumber 00/00/00000000 00/00/00000001 .. 00/FF/00FFFFFF 01/00/01000000 so you will find that the last L1 directories are empty, and that the last used L1 directory only have some of it's first L2 directories used. > Is there any advantage (performance and/or memory utilization) to reducing > the L2 dir count from 256 to, say, 150? Nope. Regards Henrik
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Detta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E4r?= en digitalt signerad meddelandedel
