lör 2006-03-11 klockan 11:37 +0000 skrev Jose Celestino: > > Incorrect. It's used for statistical and kickback reasons.. but doing so > > on relatively large shockwave files is plain stupid if you ask me.. > > Not on swf, js, or other client-side processed files. The http server > accelerated by squid does no processing whatsoever, no php, no mod_perl. I didn't say the server did any processing which makes a difference in the response. I said it used the information for statistics and kickback reasons. > Perhaps you didn't understand that these are our sites, squid is acting > as an accelerator. So we know with 200% certainty what we want to clean. > That's the only scenaria I find this of use. True. In accelerator setups Squid is the authorative server, and how it finds it's content is a business to you, nobody else. Redirectors for this purpose does it's job quite well in accelerator mode as well. But you may want the overlapping request support available in squid-3 or as patch to 2.5 (part of the cerberian patch) Regards Henrik
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Detta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E4r?= en digitalt signerad meddelandedel
