On Tue, 2006-02-21 at 11:57 +0200, Denis Vlasenko wrote: > On Tuesday 21 February 2006 10:31, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > On 21.02 12:33, Ow Mun Heng wrote: > > > I've got a squid cache running as transparent proxy on an _very_ old > > > machine. > > > > > > P 133 Mhz > > > 128MB Ram > > > 20GB Hard Disk > > > 1GB Cache in aufs > > > Fedora Core 3 > > > > > > Here are the stats reported by calamaris 2.99 > > > Total amount: requests 10471 > > > Total amount cached: requests 1330 > > > Request hit rate: % 12.70 > > > Total Bandwidth: Byte 107M > > > Bandwidth savings: Byte 1767K > > > Bandwidth savings in Percent (Byte hit rate): % 1.62 > > I think he is mostly worried about having only 1.62% of traffic > saved by squid by suppying cached content instead. Not only that. I'm also concerned with the avg Speed increase (this was snipped out in the above quotes) Average speed increase: % -0.49 -- Ow Mun Heng Gentoo/Linux on DELL D600 1.4Ghz 1.5GB RAM 98% Microsoft(tm) Free!! Neuromancer 18:15:19 up 4 days, 4:48, 6 users, load average: 0.63, 0.62, 0.65
