> > Hi, > > I was wondering if someone can be of assistance. > > I have always used squid as a proxy server for both my Home network and > the corporate environment that I work in. However, due to a change in the > guard, for whatever reasons they would like to use the apache proxy within > apache for the cache for the corporate users of over 2000 machines. > > I am still in favour of squid, as squid is a caching product and apache > well I do believe they serve web pages well, but not cache or proxy. > > What valid arguments can I use to help sway that opinion? > http://perl.apache.org/docs/1.0/guide/strategy.html#The_Squid_Server M.