> -----Original Message----- > From: H [mailto:h@xxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 3:48 AM > To: squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: CPU saturation? > > On Monday 21 November 2005 07:43, James Vanns wrote: > > On Sun, 2005-11-20 at 20:27 -0200, H wrote: > > > On Wednesday 16 November 2005 22:07, Chris Robertson wrote: > > > > On another note, with null caching, and multiple CPUs running more than > > > > one instance of squid becomes a fair bit easier. See > > > > http://squidwiki.kinkie.it/squidwiki/MultipleInstances for more > > > > details. > > > > > > indeed a kinkie page like the name and absolutly helpfull ... > > > > > > btw you read it ? > > > > Yes but wasn't helpful to us unfortunately as we already have a system > > designed in much the same way. > > > > > I think this page does not show anything so my msg was ironic ... > > even if you use it and get it done as they say it makes not > so much sense > because you have different cache_dirs as if it were different servers > > but for me it makes sense to run multiple instances when you > relate them to > each other > > otherwise I get all objects double or trice in my cache dirs > > > -- > > > H. > Heh. I did not check the link recently. The page looks to have moved to http://squidwiki.kinkie.it/MultipleInstances. If you set the instances to peer with each other, and specify "proxy-only" they will not duplicate content. Considering the original poster specified they were using null caching, this wouldn't be a concern. Chris
