> > On 15.11 14:08, Houssam Melhem wrote: > > > I configured squid to use 28 GB on each > > > > > > cache_mem 512 MB > > > cache_dir aufs /cache1/ 28000 32 256 > > > cache_dir aufs /cache2/ 28000 32 256 > > > cache_dir aufs /cache3/ 28000 32 256 > > > cache_dir aufs /cache4/ 28000 32 256 > > > cache_dir aufs /cache5/ 28000 32 256 > > > cache_dir aufs /cache6/ 28000 32 256 > > > cache_dir aufs /cache7/ 28000 32 256 > > > cache_dir aufs /cache8/ 28000 32 256 > > > cache_dir aufs /cache9/ 28000 32 256 > > > cache_dir aufs /cache10/ 28000 32 256 > On 11/16/05, Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uhlar@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > I'd use '64 256' On 17.11 10:59, Houssam Melhem wrote: > I tryed '64 256' for sometime, but i noticed that only 31 dirs where > used the other dirs were empty, and I thought this will decrease > memory usage Oh, that's different. It probably won't take more memory but if the dirs aren't used, you don't need to increase that. > > the "full system crash" will probably be problem of your OS or bad HW. OS > > should not crash unless you have bad hardware. What errors are displayed > > when crash happens? > Something like: kernel panic not syncing , Error handling interrup > and squid process ID is mentioned in the error report hmmm, that seems as a problem in your kernel... > > I think you can safely use 50GB on each cache_dir, files up to 64MB (with > > LFUDA replacement policy) and squid should fit to 8GB of memory w/o any > > problem. > > What do you mean by "files up to 64MB"? maximum_object_size 64 MB -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@xxxxxxxxxxx ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Windows 2000: 640 MB ought to be enough for anybody
