Joost, If it's not a security secret, can you describe your alternative solution ? > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Joost de Heer [mailto:sanguis@xxxxxxxxx] > Envoyé : mercredi 12 octobre 2005 13:27 > À : Matus UHLAR - fantomas > Cc : squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Objet : Re: HTTPD reverse proxy > > > There's no reason for squid to forward request as https, unless the > > network > > between squid and server is untrusted. But in such case, there's usually > > no > > need for using squid. > > I disagree. For one customer, we provide reverse proxy functionality > (although it's not Squid). The customer is divided into smaller fractions, > some of which don't trust the rest. So they want the internal traffic to > go via https too. > > Because the backend network is a private WAN, we do need the reverse proxy > on the DMZ to publish the site. > > Joost
