On 27.09 14:36, xiang dong wrote: > The squid 2.5 does not cache file in memory if the url is alreay stored in > disk. Would anyone tell me why this strategy is used? Why not keep most of > hot files in memory although they may have copys in disks? It's up to the OS, what to cache in memory. The functionality of caching objects loaded from disk wasn't yet implement and I don't know if it will ever be (because of OS cache) -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@xxxxxxxxxxx ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. - Have you got anything without Spam in it? - Well, there's Spam egg sausage and Spam, that's not got much Spam in it.
