DansGuardian has WAY more flexibility. SquidGuard is WAY faster, in my opinion. What's your priority in terms of filtering needs? Tim Rainier Information Services, Kalsec, INC "Piszcz, Justin" <jpiszcz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 09/26/2005 01:33 PM To "Odhiambo Washington" <wash@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> cc Subject RE: which is better for me ? HTB is a way to limit bandwidth via QoS/Kernel/TC/iproute2/iptables. However, he can use squid to limit bandwidth, which is what I would recommend. -----Original Message----- From: Odhiambo Washington [mailto:wash@xxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Monday, September 26, 2005 12:47 PM To: squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: which is better for me ? * On 26/09/05 13:29 -0300, LinuXKiD wrote: > Hi, > > I want to put a XXX filter on my squid. > > I've: > - kernel 2.4.28 > - squid 2.5.stable10 with zph patch > - htb bandwidth traffic control > - 1Gb RAM > - 40 Gb SATA Disk > - AMD Athlon 64 -> 2000Mhz. > - 200 hosts LAN. > > > Which XXX filter is more accurate for me ? > squid guard ? DansGuardian ? Other ? DansGuardian, naturally! Out of the box, DG will do it. It's the ONLY "true content" filter I know of. What is htb?? Software or hardware? How do you use it with Squid? Some URL of howto, please? -Wash http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html -- +======================================================================+ |\ _,,,---,,_ | Odhiambo Washington <wash@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Zzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ | Wananchi Online Ltd. www.wananchi.com |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-'| Tel: +254 20 313985-9 +254 20 313922 '---''(_/--' `-'\_) | GSM: +254 722 743223 +254 733 744121 +======================================================================+ The intelligence of any discussion diminishes with the square of the number of participants. -- Adam Walinsky
