On Sun, 11 Sep 2005, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > On Sun, 11 Sep 2005, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > > > On Thu, 8 Sep 2005, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > > > > simply trying showed that the server is not able to understand > > > Cache-Control: max-age=259200 and refuses the request. > > > > Confirmed. > > And looking in our bug database this is not the first... > > http://www.squid-cache.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=1324 > > wonder what these sites have in common making them misbehave in this manner. Probably, a RewriteCond or RewriteRule used in an attempt to prevent someone from obtaining a listing of the directory. It's looking at {REQUEST_URI} and matching on ^.*/$. If you use the URL http://www.vatlogic.com that was listed in Bugzilla, you will getting the following results. (1) The page will be successfully displayed if you bypass squid. (2) 403 Forbidden is returned if you go through squid. If you use the URL http://www.vatlogic.com/, you will get a 403 status regardless of whether you go direct or use squid. What's really cute is that the following URL will actually work. http://www.vatlogic.com/?o The parameter will get thrown away. Merton Campbell Crockett -- BEGIN: vcard VERSION: 3.0 FN: Merton Campbell Crockett ORG: General Dynamics Advanced Information Systems; Intelligence and Exploitation Systems N: Crockett;Merton;Campbell EMAIL;TYPE=internet: mcc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx TEL;TYPE=work,voice,msg,pref: +1(805)497-5045 TEL;TYPE=work,fax: +1(805)497-5050 TEL;TYPE=cell,voice,msg: +1(805)377-6762 END: vcard
