On Thursday 18 August 2005 09:16, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > obviously a faster fs can be written and read faster what means a > > better and faster caching what is valid for getting object in and > > out of the disk > > > > so sure a faster fs gives a better hit rate > > No. the only way how fs affects caching effectivity is the > overhead. FS with lower overhead may allow more objects to be > stored and thus increase cache effectivity. I am wondering why you say no first ... but you are wrong because the quantity of objects (alias more objects) are defined by the cache size and not by the fs type or performance ;) Hans
