> From: Zia-ul-Hassan Zia [mailto:zia@xxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 4:45 AM > To: squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: cache-peering using sibling relationship > We have three Squid proxies and want to share the cache between them using > cache_peer option.These three proxies are at the same level (we don't want > to configure them as parent child relationship). My concerns are. > > 1:- Should I configure all proxies as subling peers > cache_peer proxy1.example.com 8080 3130 proxy-only > cache_peer proxy2.example.com 8080 3130 proxy-only > cache_peer proxy3.example.com 8080 3130 proxy-only Yes, otherwise they won't share the cache :) I also recommend you turning on cache digests on all proxies. > 2:- Should we need to define an access list(miss_acl) for neighbour peers > in case of MISSES neighbours can fetch from Internet instead of getting > the error message.Does that make sense? No, I don't recommend you doing that. allowing misses meane allowing fetching of files that are not in cache directory, which is used for child proxies - siblings should be only allowed to fetch content that is already in cache. > miss_access allow proxy1.example.com > miss_access allow proxy2.example.com > miss_access allow proxy2.example.com > miss_access allow manager > miss_access deny all However you should allow fetching misses to your clients/users. Otherwise they won't be allowed to access pages that are not already in cache(s). -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@xxxxxxxxxxx ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Silvester Stallone: Father of the RISC concept.
