> -----Original Message----- > From: Linda W [mailto:squid-user@xxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2005 9:25 AM > To: Chris Robertson > Cc: Squid Users > Subject: Re: first time builder, playing w/build > options... > > > Chris Robertson wrote: >> I have not tried compiling Squid 3, so this I'm going to be of little help, >> but I thought that I would point out that Squid 3 is not production ready... > --- > Yes....but it's been fairly stable in day-to-day use for over a year. > I forget the exact reasons, but once I upgraded to 3.0 a year or two back, I > didn't want to go back. > > I wanted to try some of the other features than the standard "SuSE 9.1" > version -- things like delay pools...also wanted to compile a version to allow > transparent proxying through a 2.6 based kernel. These have been "back burner" > projects I delve into for a while, but them drop when they start getting too > messy. > >> In any case, I think more information is probably needed. What OS are you >> compiling Squid on? What were the parameters you gave the configure >> command? What version of Samba do you have installed? > --- > samba 3.0.9-2.6 (SuSE made). I likely didn't have the correct headers > installed, to get around it I just lopped off samba authentication as don't have > a need for authentication, anyway. Another reason to recompile it, I suppose -- > get rid of the stuff I don't need -- and wanted to try non-blocking IO with > aufs instead of ufs which SuSE doesn't compile support for. > Does this mean that your original problem (compiling Squid 3) has been solved? *SNIP* Henrik did a better job of answering the remaining bits than I could ever hope to. > -linda
