> On Tue, 31 May 2005, Anders Nordby wrote: > > >I thought most people used diskd for performance, not aufs? Then, > >threading is irrelevant. On 31.05 14:11, Henrik Nordstrom wrote: > aufs on Linux, diskd on *BSD. > > diskd also works on Linux, but aufs performs slightly better and requires > less configuration. > > aufs doesn't work well on *BSD. is this true even for FreeBSD 5? It should have good thread support even in libc (FreeBSD 4 only in kernel, or using the linuxthreads library). I haven't seen any comment telling "FreeBSD 5 threads are OK for aufs" nor "FreeBSD 5 threads are not OK for aufs"... -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@xxxxxxxxxxx ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Atheism is a non-prophet organization.
