Search squid archive

Re: [squid-users] Transparent vs manual proxy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thank you very much

wennie
----- Original Message ----- From: "Matus UHLAR - fantomas" <uhlar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <squid-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2005 2:20 PM
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Transparent vs manual proxy



On 24.05 10:00, Wennie V. Lagmay wrote:
At present my clients manually defines the proxy and port address. I can
configure my proxy server to be transparent,

I think you are speaking about intercepting proxies. The word "transparent"
in HTTP means something different.


but i need to know some
things: 1st is there a speed difference between transparent and manual
proxy?

I don't think so.

If some of my clients are already using tranparent proxy, can I
configure my squid to be transparent and at the same time manual?

yes.

what are the advantages and dis advantages of having transparent and
manual proxy?

the only advantage of intercepting proxy is that using interception, you can
force proxying for clients that don't support it.


there are many disadvantages of intercepting, starting with impossibility
for things like ident string scanning and proxy authentization, ending with
protocol violation.


Do not use interception unless you must.

--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@xxxxxxxxxxx ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Windows 2000: 640 MB ought to be enough for anybody


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Samba]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Linux USB]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux