Le 26/04/2005, Henrik Nordstrom <hno@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a dit: > On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 Magali.Bernard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > In cache.log I have found twice "FATAL: Received Segment Violation...dying." > > and then squid seems to be running fine. > > Please see Squid FAQ 11.19 Sending in Squid bug reports > <url:http://www.squid-cache.org/Doc/FAQ/FAQ-11.html#ss11.19> > > > Unfortunately there was no core file as said in the squid's mails. > > > > Extracted from squid.conf: > > > > cache_dir aufs /cache1 20000 16 256 > > > > coredump_dir /cache1 > > > > Where could I find this core file ? > > Unfortunately getting core dumps can be a little tricky. > > - You can not start Squid as root. Must start as the cache_effective_user. > > - On most OS:es threaded applications can't leave core dumps. This applies > to Squid when using the aufs cache_dir type. > > The FAQ referenced above gives a few alternative methods. > > But on the good side there has been a number of "Segmen Violation" errors > corrected since the date of the snapshot release you are using, so chances > are good the error will be gone when 2.5.STABLE10 is released. It may be > worth upgrading to the current Squid-2.5 nightly snapshots to verify. > > <url:http://www.squid-cache.org/mail-archive/squid-dev/200504/0084.html> > > Regards > Henrik > ok I'll be waiting for squid 2.5.STABLE10 Also I've found other squid crashes in cache.log* (once a week, and squid automatically restarts, so it's just annoying): FATAL: xstrdup: tried to dup a NULL pointer! Squid Cache (Version 2.5.STABLE9-20050324): Terminated abnormally. CPU Usage: 7246.940 seconds = 2157.440 user + 5089.500 sys Maximum Resident Size: 0 KB Page faults with physical i/o: 436 Memory usage for squid via mallinfo(): total space in arena: 611653 KB Ordinary blocks: 600549 KB 3865 blks Small blocks: 0 KB 0 blks Holding blocks: 4864 KB 10 blks Free Small blocks: 0 KB Free Ordinary blocks: 11103 KB Total in use: 605413 KB 99% Total free: 11103 KB 2% But one more time it is not relevant without core file. Many thanks for your explanations. -- ______________________________________________________________ A: Yes. Magali BERNARD >Q: Are you sure? >>A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>>Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?
