On Sat, 2005-03-19 at 15:45, Steve Snyder wrote: > It seems that recent Red Hat packages of Squid are using the > "--enable-truncate" config option by default. Aparently someone there > thinks there is a gain to be made by truncating rather than unlinking the > cached objects. > > I wonder if this is applicable to my Squid (v2.5S9) installation. I'm > running a Red Hat distro, but using a ReiserFS filesystem (with > notail,noatime options) for my cache rather than RH's default ext3. Both > configurations use aufs for storage. > I'm looking for a little guidance on whether or not "--enable-truncate" is > appropriate for me. Any opinions? I don't believe it makes a significant difference, especially on ReiserFS. Kinkie
