Re: [squid-users] LVS/TUN or LVS/DR

[Askar <askar@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Andrew Sawyers wrote:

>  
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Henrik Nordstrom [mailto:hno@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 6:14 PM
> > To: Andrew Sawyers
> > Cc: 'Henrik Nordstrom'; 'Askar'; 'Squid Users'
> > Subject: RE: [squid-users] LVS/TUN or LVS/DR
> >
> > On Wed, 9 Feb 2005, Andrew Sawyers wrote:
> >
> >    
> >
> > > Any particular reason why you're after DR mode?  I have several squids
> > >      
> > load
> >    
> >
> > > balanced in masq mode and we're able to handle more traffic then most
> > >      
> > sites
> >    
> >
> > > can aspire too - with basically 0 load on the LVS server.
> > >      
> > If you do interception then LVS must not NAT the destination IP of the
> > connections, or else Squid has no way of figuring out what the original
> > destination was on HTTP/1.0 requests without Host header.
> >    
>
> Excellent, thanks - that solves that. :)
>  
>
> > Regards
> > Henrik
> >    
>
> Andrew
>
>  
Thank you all for your time and patience that clear the concept of LVS 
to me, I will come back with my queries regarding LVS if we got problem 
during actaul migration to LVS.

Regards