On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 20:49:40 +0100 (CET), Henrik Nordstrom <hno@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Askar wrote: > > > I am wondering if anyone here running "Virtual Server via IP Tunneling" or > > "Virtual Server via Direct Routing", LVS based caches cluster. > Yep, I am currently using a LVS/DR LVS cluster of 2 squid proxies in our production environment. Persistency is set at 10mins to get around some small issues we had with cache children when we were using DNS round robin - not sure if persistency is needed or not but put it in just in case. No problems whatsoever so far (been running for about a month). Incidentally, and most definitely off topic, we are also using LVS to load balance HTTP/S, FTP, IMAP, POP and LDAP - works like a charm. Regards, David Brown > Not currently, but I have used LVS/DR and LVS/NAT in the past a lot to > load balance servers, including Squid proxy servers. Never had any reason > to use LVS/TUN as you only need this if there is a router inbetween LVS > and the host, and LVS/NAT is not desireable. > > Why you ask? > > Regards > Henrik >
