On Tuesday 25 January 2005 10:43, RAHUL T. KARTHA wrote: > HAS ANY ONE HERE TRIED TO DOA MULTI UPLINK CACHE I.E if you are interested in this we do have several ISPs running this but look first, what and how much internal networks you run does not matter at this stage if you are running BGP you do it at router level and you can use one front-end cache if you are running some load-balance with Cisco-CEF or similar you do it also at router level and can use one front-end cache if you are otherwise "pseudo-multi-homed" as lots of people do with one IP-link and another or several ADSL where you need NAT you better put one cache for each link and a chield as main cache for your network. You can then use parent weight or some policy routing on OS-Level to get what you want and with some good ideas you get a certain balance and even redundance since squid do not query a dead parent if you configure it right. We tried linux iproute2 and policy routing on BSD for single caches but the performance of the former example is really better, BTW both gave bad results when one link died and even stopped to serve correctly, but sure depends of what you want and how much you can spend in this (weak and watch time ;) and money) Hans -- _______________________________________________________ Mensagens nÃo assinadas com GPG nÃo sÃo minhas. Messages without GPG signature are not from me. _______________________________________________________
Attachment:
pgprWcxYXwcWG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
