Hello Thomas, On 5/2/22 12:35, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > Hi Javier > > Am 02.05.22 um 10:48 schrieb Javier Martinez Canillas: >> Hello, >> >> This series contain patches suggested by Thomas Zimmermannas a feedback for Ups, I missed a space here. I meant to write "Zimmermann as a feedback..." >> "[RFC PATCH v4 00/11] Fix some race between sysfb device registration and >> drivers probe" [0]. >> >> Since other changes in [0] were more controversial, I decided to just split >> this part in a new patch-set and revisit the rest of the patches later. >> >> Patch #1 is just a cleanup since when working on this noticed that some DRM >> drivers were passing as preferred bits per pixel to drm_fbdev_generic_setup() >> the value that is the default anyways. >> >> Patch #2 renames the 'preferred_bpp' drm_fbdev_generic_setup() parameter to >> 'options', and make this a multi field parameter so that it can be extended >> later to pass other options as well. >> >> Patch #3 finally adds the new DRM_FB_FW option and makes simpledrm to use it >> so that the registered framebuffer device is also marked as firmware provided. > > For the whole patchset: > > Reviewed-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@xxxxxxx> > > Thanks a lot! > Thanks for the prompt review! -- Best regards, Javier Martinez Canillas Linux Engineering Red Hat