Re: [PATCH 31/37] drm: handle HAS_IOPORT dependencies

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2022-04-29 at 15:50 +0200, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> In a future patch HAS_IOPORT=n will result in inb()/outb() and friends
> not being declared. We thus need to add HAS_IOPORT as dependency for
> those drivers using them. There is also a direct and hard coded use in
> cirrus.c which according to the comment is only necessary during resume.
> Let's just skip this as for example s390 which doesn't have I/O port
> support also doesen't support suspend/resume.
> 
> Co-developed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---

Sorry everyone. I sent this as PATCH in error while preparing to sent
the same series as RFC. Since e-mail has no remote delete and I lack a
time machine let's just all pretend you only got the RFC.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]