On Mon, 2019-02-04 at 08:30 -0600, Jeremy White wrote: > > > I'd be delighted if spice-html5 had a proper name space! > > > > How should we proceed? I could implement this using ES6 exports, > > but > > that rules out really old browsers. Not sure if CommonJS exports > > would > > cover a broader audience thought. > > To some extent, spice-html5 does not support truly old browsers, so > I > think it would make sense to use ES6. We'll probably want to couple > this with a substantial version increment (1.0?) which will also > help > folks understand the distinction. Well, after checking ES6 imports are super recent in Firefox (starting with 60 back in May). > > I saw in the code some workarounds for IE10... Do we still need to > > care > > about Internet Explorer? > > I'd like to be sure that a 'stock' Windows 10 box can run spice- > html5. > (A few years ago, I would have included Windows 7, but I think we're > close enough to it's EOL that we can let it go). For sure Windows 10 comes with Egde now. > So if Edge supplies the features IE lacks, then perhaps we could let > those go. (I think the two main issues were the lack of data uri > support, which requires 'simulatecursor.js' and the addition of > slice() > in spicearraybuffer.js). So we can drop the spicearraybuffer.js since this is in IE 11 and Egde. For the simulatecursor.js, I have no idea. _______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel