Re: [PATCH] drm/qxl: use qxl_num_crtc directly

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> 
> On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 05:59:25AM -0500, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > > 
> > > Just use qxl_num_crtc directly everywhere instead of using
> > > qdev->monitors_config->max_allowed.  Drops pointless indirection
> > > and also is less confusing.
> > > 
> > 
> > To me is MORE confusing, why comparing number of something with
> > another number? Previously code was comparing number of monitors
> > with number of monitors, not number of CRTs with number of
> > monitors.
> 
> Yes, spice/qxl and drm/kms use slightly different terminology.
> 
> drm crtc == qxl monitor.
> drm framebuffer == qxl surface.
> 
> You need to know that anyway when looking at the qxl ksm code.  We
> have function names like qxl_crtc_update_monitors_config().  I fail
> to see why that is a problem ...
> 
> cheers,
>   Gerd
> 
> 

I don't see any problem too but you are explaining to me
why your rationale "and also is less confusing" does not
stand.

Frediano
_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]