Re: [PATCH spice-server 2/2] meson: Add spice-protocol as subproject

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 10:27:00AM +0200, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 04:38:26PM -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > > 
> > > Fixes the cases where either the dependency is not installed or the
> > > version installed does not satisfy the requirement.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Eduardo Lima (Etrunko) <etrunko@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > Why this is not true for autoconf?
> > 
> > As spice-protocol is a dependency also for spice-common would be better
> > if spice-protocol would be a subproject of spice-common but was
> > decided to have spice-protocol as a separate project with its own
> > ABI.
> 
> Yes, I'd rather we don't go back to having spice-protocol releases, but
> at the same time bundling it with some projects.

Ok, not really clear after rereading it.

At the moment we have spice-protocol releases and everyone uses that. In
my opinion it's better this way, rather than what this patch suggests,
where some components would be bundling spice-protocol, and others would
still be using the released version.

Christophe

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]