Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/20] Monitor ID rework

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2018-08-24 at 13:49 +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>   Hi,
> 
> > > Long-term there should be no need to have a separate QXL device for
> > > boot messages.
> > 
> > Interesting, why do you think so?
> 
> Well, there is the vnc console for the nvidia vgpu.  Which wasn't
> mentioned in this thread yet, how does it fit into the picture btw?  I
> guess there will be two channels, one classic display channel for the
> vnc console and one stream channel for the video stream from the guest
> agent?

I was quite confused by this, so I've asked around and the confusion
remains :) I have no idea how the VNC fit into the picture, I didn't
know about it.

But a VNC console would be something outside of SPICE? Or not? You seem
to be saying the VNC console would be sent over a SPICE display
channel? That doesn't make much sense to me.

Cheers,
Lukas

> My intention is to use the vnc console for boot messages too, using the
> ramfb support which was added to qemu 3.0.
> 
> https://git.kraxel.org/cgit/qemu/log/?h=sirius/ramfb-vfio
> 
> cheers,
>   Gerd
> 
_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]