Re: [PATCH libcacard 2/2] vreader: Handle read failure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 11:33 AM Jakub Jelen <jjelen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2018-08-08 at 16:51 +0200, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 8:34 PM, Jason Andryuk <jandryuk@xxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> > > If a command fails, card_status will not match VCARD_DONE.  That
> > > will
> > > trigger the assert and abort the process.  Instead, handle
> > > VCARD_FAIL and
> > > return an error in that case.  Client software can then deal with
> > > the
> > > error, and we continue running to handle future commands.
> > >
> > > This can be triggered by removing the physical smartcard mid-
> > > operation.
> >
> > There are other paths, like invalid instruction on
> > cac_common_process_apdu_read()
>
> The invalid instructions should return valid response with error
> indicated in SW (status words). The referenced function has the default
> VCARD_FAIL value is in the code somehow bogus in case we would like to
> fail early or fail to handle some case (?).
>
> The VCARD_FAIL option is really about more serious issues as Jason is
> pointing out.
>
> Handling the error here, rather than segfaulting in assert later sounds
> like a good idea. But from reading the code, I still can not find a
> path where we could encounter this value here.
>
> From what I see, all the paths here return either VCARD_DONE. Can you
> advice during which operation did you encounter this error?

My setup is qemu <-> vscclient <-> pcscd with passthru:
vscclient -e 'use_hw=yes hw_type=passthru'

In a Windows VM, I ran `certutil -scinfo` from a cmd window.  While it
was running, I pulled out my smart card.  Without my patch, vscclient
terminates.  With it, vscclient continues running.

The call stack is:
vreader_xfr_bytes
  vcard_process_apdu
    vcard_process_applet_apdu
      apdu_cb

apdu_cb can return VCARD_FAIL for send_receive or
vcard_response_new_data failure.

So you think src/capcsc.c:apdu_cb() should return VCARD_DONE but use
vcard_response_set_status_bytes to write an appropriate status word?

Is there a better tool than vscclient for passing through a physical
smart card to a VM?  Spice isn't an option for my VM setup.

Thanks,
Jason
_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]