Re: SPICE logging facilities

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 11:38:14AM -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> Another question is however "Are we going to use g_critical as
> g_critical?". It sounds a tricky question. Let say that a new person
> starts to look at the code and knows GLib. He see g_critical and
> think "well, this by default log a critical warning and continue"
> but instead on Spice is always fatal.

Unless I am confused, g_critical() should have the usual default
behaviour, and spice_critical() aborts, see
test_spice_abort_level_g_warning and the following tests
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/spice/spice-common/blob/master/tests/test-logging.c#L62

Christophe

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Linux Virtualization]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]