> > On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 12:04:18PM -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote: > > Not much replies to this specific patch, but I agree was better to > > integrate dependencies (spice-protocol and spice-common) projects > > first. > > > > > > diff --git a/subprojects/spice-common.wrap > > > b/subprojects/spice-common.wrap > > > new file mode 100644 > > > index 00000000..6117c631 > > > --- /dev/null > > > +++ b/subprojects/spice-common.wrap > > > @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ > > > +[wrap-git] > > > +directory=spice-common > > > +url=https://gitlab.com/etrunko/spice-common.git > > > +revision=meson > > > > Don't like much the full URL. Is it not possible to have something > > relative to the current one? > > Also, does this points just to master? Would be a regression to > > current autoconf/submodule behaviour. > > This is one part of the patch which imo does not make sense without > autotools removal (autotools build -> spice-common/ submodule, meson build -> > meson-specific subprojects/spice-common/ through this .wrap file). I've > already sent a patch to avoid this to Eduardo, so I'm expecting at some > point an updated patch with this change, and probably a few more smaller > ones. > > Christophe > Can't be use git modules with Meson? Maybe a workaround could be creating a "subprojects" directory with a link to spice-common git module? Would be a pity if this were a stopover to merge Meson integration. By the way the revision should be a commit hash to avoid to have ABI (as this would require a release procedure on spice-common we don't have/want). Still the problem of relative URL remains. Doing a quick search this seems not supported by Meson. Frediano _______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel