On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 10:46:35AM +0200, Christophe Fergeau wrote: > On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 10:43:20AM +0200, Christophe Fergeau wrote: > > On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 10:23:01AM +0300, Snir Sheriber wrote: > > Yes, indeed, this is similar to what you were doing in earlier > > iterations. > > > > > I personally really like the current flow of the request for handle > > > using the signal and getting it as a response, avoiding of setting > > > and getting an handle from different components. > > > > Using signals as some generic way of calling a getter on some unknown > > class is rather unusual, and feels like something you should not really > > be using signals for. > > Just realized, this change is most likely an ABI break: (I promise I'll stop replying to myself :d). Not sure we are supporting inheritance from SpiceDisplayChannel, nor that it makes sense, so maybe not a big problem. Christophe
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel