On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 06:51:52PM +0300, Uri Lublin wrote:
> On 04/16/2018 01:13 PM, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> > At the moment, we'll unconditionally release the guest QXL resources in
> > red_put_drawable() even if red_get_drawable() failed and did not
> > initialize drawable->release_info_ext properly.
> > This commit checks the QXLReleaseInfo in release_info_ext is non-0
> > before attempting to release it.
> > ---
> > server/red-parse-qxl.c | 4 +++-
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/server/red-parse-qxl.c b/server/red-parse-qxl.c
> > index dc99d1f30..80746ecbb 100644
> > --- a/server/red-parse-qxl.c
> > +++ b/server/red-parse-qxl.c
> > @@ -1504,7 +1504,9 @@ void red_drawable_unref(RedDrawable *red_drawable)
> > if (--red_drawable->refs) {
> > return;
> > }
> > - red_qxl_release_resource(red_drawable->qxl, red_drawable->release_info_ext);
> > + if (red_drawable->release_info_ext.info != NULL) {
> > + red_qxl_release_resource(red_drawable->qxl, red_drawable->release_info_ext);
>
> Hi Christophe,
>
> Would it not be better to do the check in red_qxl_release_resource ?
> (and also set ".info" to NULL after it is released)
After implementing Frediano's suggestion, this test is gone ;)
Christophe
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel