Re: [PATCH 2/2] Eliminate signed/unsigned warning

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 19, 2018 at 03:06:40PM +0100, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
> 
> 
> > On 19 Feb 2018, at 13:24, Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 04:23:06PM +0100, Christophe de Dinechin wrote:
> >> From: Christophe de Dinechin <dinechin@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> 
> >> Without this, GCC complains about signed / unsigned comparisons:
> >> 
> >> mjpeg-fallback.cpp:121:24: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions [-Wsign-compare]
> >>     if (win_info.width != last_width || win_info.height != last_height) {
> >>         ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > 
> > Are you getting this using the default CXXFLAGS?
> 
> No, this was a side effect of tracking some other warning.

Would be nice to mention this in the commit log then, while we want the
build with the default flags to be warning-free, fixing additional
warnings will definitely be considered on a case by case basis.

> 
> 
> > Here I seem to be getting -Wno-sign-compare by default.
> 
> Why is this silenced?

This probably was not intentionally silenced, but enabling it would be a
good complement to this patch if this warning is deemed useful...

Christophe

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]