> > > On 14 Feb 2018, at 13:34, Lukáš Hrázký <lhrazky@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Introduce a unit test framework (Catch) to the codebase and a simple > > unit test for parsing the options of the mjpeg plugin. > > > > Signed-off-by: Lukáš Hrázký <lhrazky@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > configure.ac | 3 ++ > > src/mjpeg-fallback.cpp | 5 +++ > > src/mjpeg-fallback.hpp | 1 + > > src/unittests/.gitignore | 5 +-- > > src/unittests/Makefile.am | 15 +++++++++ > > src/unittests/test-mjpeg-fallback.cpp | 58 > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 6 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > create mode 100644 src/unittests/test-mjpeg-fallback.cpp > > > > diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac > > index 8795dae..5aab662 100644 > > --- a/configure.ac > > +++ b/configure.ac > > @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ if test x"$ac_cv_prog_cc_c99" = xno; then > > AC_MSG_ERROR([C99 compiler is required.]) > > fi > > AC_PROG_CXX > > +AC_LANG(C++) > > AX_CXX_COMPILE_STDCXX_11 > > AC_PROG_INSTALL > > AC_CANONICAL_HOST > > @@ -49,6 +50,8 @@ AC_CHECK_LIB(jpeg, jpeg_destroy_decompress, > > AC_MSG_ERROR([libjpeg not found])) > > AC_SUBST(JPEG_LIBS) > > > > +AC_CHECK_HEADER([catch/catch.hpp],,[AC_MSG_ERROR([Could not find Catch > > dependency header (catch/catch.hpp)])]) > > Instead of an error, shouldn’t we instead fallback to not compiling the unit > tests? Possibly a warning? > Good point but I would suggest a follow up and an explicit --I-dont-really-want-unittests option, I agree people should run tests. Another follow up is a patch for the spec file. Frediano _______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel