On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 12:11:33PM +0000, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> Allows to specify abstract Unix sockets addresses.
> These Unix sockets are supported on Linux and allows to not
> have file system names.
What would be the use-case? Just cleaner not to have a dummy path in the
FS? Or does it bring more? I'd say why not, though a spice-gtk patch
will be needed too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Frediano Ziglio <fziglio@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> server/reds.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Changes since v1:
> - do not unlink no file socket.
>
> diff --git a/server/reds.c b/server/reds.c
> index ebcbe496..ca0bb75a 100644
> --- a/server/reds.c
> +++ b/server/reds.c
> @@ -2585,8 +2585,12 @@ static int reds_init_socket(const char *addr, int portnr, int family)
>
> local.sun_family = AF_UNIX;
> g_strlcpy(local.sun_path, addr, sizeof(local.sun_path));
> - unlink(local.sun_path);
> len = SUN_LEN(&local);
> + if (local.sun_path[0] == '@') {
> + local.sun_path[0] = 0;
> + } else {
> + unlink(local.sun_path);
> + }
> if (bind(slisten, (struct sockaddr *)&local, len) == -1) {
> perror("bind");
> return -1;
> --
> 2.14.3
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spice-devel mailing list
> Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel