Hi ----- Original Message ----- > Hi, > > On Wed, Aug 09, 2017 at 10:48:58PM +0200, marcandre.lureau@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > From: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > spicy is only a test UI. A proper end-user UI is provided by > > virt-viewer, vinagre or Boxes for example. > > > > Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@xxxxxxxxxx> > > I don't see why a testing tool should not be installed... Because users expect it to be a fully-featured client, which is not. Imho, as a testing tool, it's fine to have it only in the build directory. You may install it manually, but it shouldn't be there by default. We may want to have --enable-installed-tests, that would be a different patch though https://wiki.gnome.org/Initiatives/GnomeGoals/InstalledTests > > > --- > > tools/Makefile.am | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/tools/Makefile.am b/tools/Makefile.am > > index 7c2d90e..5b7c4de 100644 > > --- a/tools/Makefile.am > > +++ b/tools/Makefile.am > > @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ TOOLS_CPPFLAGS = \ > > $(NULL) > > > > if WITH_GTK > > -bin_PROGRAMS += spicy > > +noinst_PROGRAMS = spicy > > TOOLS_CPPFLAGS += $(GTK_CFLAGS) > > endif > > > > -- > > 2.14.0.1.geff633fa0 > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Spice-devel mailing list > > Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel > _______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel