> > Hi > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > If you are worried about more effort for PRs considering the solution > > 2 could be an option. If patchew is able to create an "item" (actually > > I think they call them just "series") and you are able to see the > > merge status and change it if needed you hardly will forget a series. > > I agree, and even before a series exist, it is useful to keep track of the > discussion/feature state, and there is bugzilla (and the wiki) for that. > > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=runnamed&list_id=620536&namedcmd=spice This gives me "The search named spice does not exist.". > https://www.spice-space.org/page/In_progress > > For instance, the seamless series is really not "lost", if only people keep > using bugzilla: > https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39238 Are you suggesting to open a bug report for every patch send to the ML? > > I am hardly convinced adding yet another way to track things will improve the > situation, quite the contrary. > These ways seems far from the series/patches level we are mainly discussing. Frediano _______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel