Re: [spice-common] Some steps toward quic_tmpl.c and quic_rgb_tmpl.c 'unification'

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 04:24:14AM -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> 
> Isn't the s/decorrelate_drow/correlate_row patch part of 2).

Ah that one too yeah, missed it when quickly glancing through it.

> I remember you mentioned also the fact that Windows driver contains
> Quic code. I checked and is really similar. Should we try to reuse
> spice-common code directly?

In an ideal world where we have infinite time, definitely. In our
imperfect world, not sure it's worth it (the windows driver probably
does not make use of spice-common, don't even know if their licenses
are compatible, the quic code is imo legacy, ...). I definitely would
not make this a priority.

Christophe

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]