Hey, On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 10:49:48PM +0200, Pavel Grunt wrote: > To give example for creating flatpaks depending on spice-gtk > Yup, good idea, just a few minor comments: > How to use to build and run the flatpak: Maybe mention that the gnome 3.24 SDK has to be installed? > $ flatpak-builder spicy org.spicespace.spicy.json I'd use data/org.spicespace.spicy.json Any reason for using org.spicespace rather than org.spice-space? I think we usually use the latter as our domain name, even though spicespace is an alias to it. > $ flatpak build-export repo spicy > $ flatpak --user remote-add --no-gpg-verify --if-not-exists spice-repo repo > $ flatpak --user install spice-repo org.spicespace.spicy > $ flatpak run org.spicespace.spicy > --- > data/org.spicespace.spicy.json | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 data/org.spicespace.spicy.json > > diff --git a/data/org.spicespace.spicy.json b/data/org.spicespace.spicy.json > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..e384aff > --- /dev/null > +++ b/data/org.spicespace.spicy.json > @@ -0,0 +1,72 @@ > +{ > + "app-id": "org.spicespace.spicy", > + "runtime": "org.gnome.Platform", > + "runtime-version": "3.24", > + "sdk": "org.gnome.Sdk", > + "command": "spicy", > + "tags": ["devel", "development", "nightly"], > + "finish-args": [ > + "--share=ipc", "--socket=x11", > + "--socket=wayland", > + "--filesystem=xdg-pictures", > + "--share=network" > + ], > + "modules": [ > + { > + "name": "python-six", > + "buildsystem": "simple", > + "build-commands": [ > + "pip3 install --target=/app six-1.10.0-py2.py3-none-any.whl" > + ], > + "sources": [ > + { > + "type": "file", > + "url": "https://pypi.python.org/packages/c8/0a/b6723e1bc4c516cb687841499455a8505b44607ab535be01091c0f24f079/six-1.10.0-py2.py3-none-any.whl#md5=3ab558cf5d4f7a72611d59a81a315dc8", > + "sha256": "0ff78c403d9bccf5a425a6d31a12aa6b47f1c21ca4dc2573a7e2f32a97335eb1" > + } > + ] > + }, > + { > + "name": "pyparsing", > + "buildsystem": "simple", > + "build-commands": [ > + "pip3 install --target=/app pyparsing-2.0.3-py2.py3-none-any.whl" > + ], > + "sources": [ > + { > + "type": "file", > + "url": "https://pypi.python.org/packages/8f/f4/3a70b5e5b865b1ec45fe48dc5a57cd4facb5c7bd80e5cb1255c362732e81/pyparsing-2.0.3-py2.py3-none-any.whl#md5=4c16ef222caea2e5de741ae503aae652", > + "sha256": "a9c896bab06dbf3759ad5fb63cfdb3777191e2c4ae640e6dd69ed37530f6ba56" > + } > + ] > + }, > + { > + "builddir": true, > + "name": "spice-protocol", > + "sources": [ > + { > + "type": "git", > + "url": "git://anongit.freedesktop.org/spice/spice-protocol" > + } > + ] > + }, > + { > + "builddir": true, > + "name": "spice-gtk", > + "build-options": { > + "env": { > + "PERL5LIB": "/app/lib/perl5", > + "PYTHONPATH": "/app" > + } Is that really required? Shouldn't flatpak-builder do it for us? Christophe
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel