Hi ----- Original Message ----- > On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 06:26:58AM -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote: > > > > > > > > > I think we should replace SPICE_VERIFY / verify with G_STATIC* > > > > > equivalents. > > > > > > > > > > > > > We actually can't for compatibility reason. Some version of GLib have > > > > broken macros and we still claim RHEL 6 support > > > > > > > > > > Ah, I vaguely recall some discussion, do you have a pointer? I can't find > > > changes in glib git log. > > > > > > > I think Christophe F pointed out the problem. Don't remember exactly, I > > think they were using array sizes but this do not work with C99. > > Looking at current GLib master code is still using that broken > > trick. > > This is https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=758844 > Test case from the bug is > > int main (int argc, char **argv) > { > G_STATIC_ASSERT(argc == 4); > > return 0; > } > > which succeeds while the macro cannot know the value of argc. > Thanks, too bad they didn't manage to introduce a verify-like solution. (I wouldn't claim the glib macro to be broken though) _______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel