Re: Role of spice_logger

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 11:12:11AM -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > 
> > I’m looking at logging functions in log.c, and I wonder why we disable
> > logging only at the spice_logger level.
> > 
> > There is a test like this in spice_logger:
> > 
> >     if (glib_debug_level != 0) {
> >         if ((log_level & G_LOG_LEVEL_MASK) > glib_debug_level)
> >             return; // do not print anything
> >     }
> > 
> > Shouldn’t put the test in spice_log, so that we don’t do all the formatting
> > and allocation if we don’t need it?
> > 
> > 
> > Christophe
> 
> Yes, make sense

We want g_log as well as spice_log to take into account the
SPICE_DEBUG_LEVEL environment variable (for backward compat).
If you move the test above to spice_log, I suspect g_warning & friends
will stop honouring SPICE_DEBUG_LEVEL. spice-common/tests/test-logging.c
might have a test for that if you want to experiment..

Christophe

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]