On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 03:55:04PM +0200, Victor Toso wrote: > I'm not specialist on possible problems but although ascii is compatible > with utf8 it might become a problem to not have a standard well defined > in the future although Marc-André said it should be UTF-8. If you mandate UTF-8 in the protocol, you probably cause a regression if your client has an iso8859-1 filename, and you dnd that to a VM where you also expect the iso8859-1 filename. In this day and age, this is just a corner case, but I'm not sure mandating UTF8 conversion of filenames before dnd'ing them is not going to cause issue either. Christophe
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel