Re: [PATCH spice-server] Initialize earlier GLib type system if necessary

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 01:27:45PM +0100, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> Before GLib 2.36 you should call g_type_init before attempting
> any GLib type usage.
> As constructor function are called before even main we need
> to call g_type_init much before do_spice_init.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Frediano Ziglio <fziglio@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  server/red-channel-capabilities.c | 4 ++++
>  server/reds.c                     | 3 ---
>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/server/red-channel-capabilities.c b/server/red-channel-capabilities.c
> index c08cc1a..5a3984a 100644
> --- a/server/red-channel-capabilities.c
> +++ b/server/red-channel-capabilities.c
> @@ -61,6 +61,10 @@ static void red_channel_capabilities_free(RedChannelCapabilities *caps)
>  
>  SPICE_CONSTRUCTOR_FUNC(red_channel_capabilities_construct)
>  {
> +#if !GLIB_CHECK_VERSION(2,36,0)
> +    g_type_init();
> +#endif
> +
>      red_channel_capabilities_type =
>          g_boxed_type_register_static("RedChannelCapabilities",
>                                       (GBoxedCopyFunc) red_channel_capabilities_dup,

How does this interact with SPICE_CONSTRUCTOR_FUNC(spice_log_init) in
spice-common/log.c? Which one is going to get called first? Ideally, the
logging one, but in this case, should the g_type_init() got there
instead?

Acked-by: Christophe Fergeau <cfergeau@xxxxxxxxxx>

if you think this is fine.

Christophe

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]