> > > > > On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 08:27:27AM -0500, Frediano Ziglio wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 08, 2017 at 12:10:52PM -0600, Jonathon Jongsma wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 2017-02-07 at 11:59 +0100, Christophe Fergeau wrote: > > > > > > It was probably meant to be used as a "user_data" argument for the > > > > > > various callbacks, but turns out not to be used. > > > > > > > > > > Hmm, it looks like the last use of this 'data' variable was removed > > > > > in > > > > > 96e94c6f. That commit used g_object_set_data() to attach the > > > > > 'dispatcher' object to the channel object rather than setting priv- > > > > > >data via the _register_client_cbs() function. I'm not too fond of > > > > > g_object_set_data() for that use (even though apparently I was the > > > > > one > > > > > that did it). I wonder if there's a better approach than either of > > > > > these approaches... I'll try to review the rest of the patches in > > > > > this > > > > > series and come back to this... > > > > > > > > It seems the use of g_object_set_data() for "dispatcher" could easily > > > > be > > > > changed to a regular gobject property as it's only set right after > > > > creating the cursor/display channels. > > > > > > > > Christophe > > > > > > > > > > -1 for property > > > > Not so useful without a rationale... "gobject property" is not exclusive > > with foo_get_dispatcher()/foo_set_dispatcher() methods if that's the > > reason for your -1. > > > > Christophe > > > > Surely better, even better the Decorator pattern! > A more thought on the original patch. The original patch is not adding any regression, the data/opaque field is not used. Maybe we could just apply the patch and add some a TODO comment for a follow up ? Frediano _______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel