Re: [PATCH spice-server v2] gstreamer: Include only needed fields in SpiceFormatForGStreamer structure

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 10:17:09AM +0100, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 03:09:36PM +0100, Victor Toso wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 01, 2017 at 05:48:32AM -0500, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 10:29:22AM +0000, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > > > > This structure is used to store format information for
> > > > > both Gstreamer 0.10 and 1.0 however the two format uses
> > > > > different fields from it.
> > > > > Use a macro to filter only needed fields.
> > > > > This currently also fixes a compile error using Gstreamer 0.10
> > > > > (GST_VIDEO_FORMAT_RGB15 not defined as not available).
> > > >
> > > > For how long is it intended to support gstreamer 0.10 in the server?
> > > >
> > > >   toso
> > >
> > > Till rhel6 is in some way supported I suppose.
> >
> > In rhel 6, we have v0.12.4 + patches but no gstreamer.
> >
> > If the reason for gstreamer 0.10 is due rhel6, we should at least target
> > support for it till next stable release (0.14.0) or so, and drop it
> > IMHO.
>
> I believe François/Jeremy had some use for the GStreamer code on el6.
> I'd prefer that we keep el6 support in 0.14.0, and drop it in the next
> cycle.
>
> Christophe

Okay :)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]