Re: [PATCH spice-server v2 3/3] Add a base test for statistic file

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 10:34:09AM -0500, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > 
> > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 11:35:07AM +0000, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
> > > Create a file and add/remove some nodes.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Frediano Ziglio <fziglio@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  server/tests/Makefile.am      |  1 +
> > >  server/tests/stat-file-test.c | 94
> > >  +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  2 files changed, 95 insertions(+)
> > >  create mode 100644 server/tests/stat-file-test.c
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/server/tests/Makefile.am b/server/tests/Makefile.am
> > > index 8580a9a..8351253 100644
> > > --- a/server/tests/Makefile.am
> > > +++ b/server/tests/Makefile.am
> > > @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ check_PROGRAMS =				\
> > >  	test-agent-msg-filter			\
> > >  	test-loop				\
> > >  	test-qxl-parsing			\
> > > +	stat-file-test				\
> > >  	$(NULL)
> > >  
> > >  noinst_PROGRAMS =				\
> > > diff --git a/server/tests/stat-file-test.c b/server/tests/stat-file-test.c
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 0000000..364a8fc
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/server/tests/stat-file-test.c
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
> > > +/* -*- Mode: C; c-basic-offset: 4; indent-tabs-mode: nil -*- */
> > > +/*
> > > +   Copyright (C) 2016 Red Hat, Inc.
> > > +
> > > +   This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
> > > +   modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
> > > +   License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
> > > +   version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
> > > +
> > > +   This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
> > > +   but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
> > > +   MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU
> > > +   Lesser General Public License for more details.
> > > +
> > > +   You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public
> > > +   License along with this library; if not, see
> > > <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
> > > +*/
> > > +#include <config.h>
> > > +#include <stdlib.h>
> > > +#include <unistd.h>
> > > +#include <string.h>
> > > +#include <glib.h>
> > > +#include <spice.h>
> > > +
> > > +#include "stat-file.h"
> > > +
> > > +/* GLIB_CHECK_VERSION(2, 40, 0) */
> > > +#ifndef g_assert_nonnull
> > > +#define g_assert_nonnull g_assert
> > > +#endif
> > > +
> > > +static void stat_file(void)
> > > +{
> > > +    RedStatFile stat_file;
> > > +    StatNodeRef ref, refs[10];
> > > +    uint64_t *counter, *counters[10];
> > > +    int i;
> > > +    char *filename = NULL;
> > > +    char name[20];
> > > +
> > > +    /* create */
> > > +    stat_file_init(&stat_file, 10);
> > > +
> > > +    g_assert_nonnull(stat_file.shm_name);
> > > +    filename = strdup(stat_file.shm_name);
> > 
> > I think it's leaked at the end of the test. I'd add a
> > stat_file_get_shm_name() or such though as this is the only member from
> > the struct that is needed in order to make the struct opaque.
> > 
> > > +    g_assert(access(stat_file.shm_name, R_OK));
> > > +
> > > +    /* fill all nodes */
> > > +    for (i = 0; i < 10; ++i) {
> > > +        sprintf(name, "node %d", i);
> > > +        ref = refs[i] = stat_file_add_node(&stat_file, INVALID_STAT_REF,
> > > name, TRUE);
> > 
> > Not a big fan of several statements on the same line.
> > 
> > > +        g_assert_cmpuint(ref,!=,INVALID_STAT_REF);
> > > +    }
> > > +
> > > +    /* should fail */
> > > +    ref = stat_file_add_node(&stat_file, INVALID_STAT_REF, "invalid",
> > > TRUE);
> > > +    g_assert_cmpuint(ref,==,INVALID_STAT_REF);
> > > +
> > > +    /* we should find already present nodes */
> > > +    for (i = 0; i < 10; ++i) {
> > > +        sprintf(name, "node %d", (i * 17 + 5) % 10);
> > 
> > Why use this formula? (ditto with the other *23 + 3 below)
> > 
> 
> Just to delete some nodes here and there.

Problem is, it's not obvious at all to me whether this is going to be
"here and there", or just always return the same value, ... Dunno how to
make that more obvious while avoiding doing it sequentially.

Christophe

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Spice-devel mailing list
Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]     [Monitors]