On Tue, 2016-11-15 at 11:23 +0100, Christophe Fergeau wrote: > This would have deserved a "why?" in the log even if it's just a few > lines (something like "it's redundant because all we need is sin->st > which we can pass directly/get directly from yyy"). > > In my opinion, commits with only a short log are only acceptable > for the most trivial of commits, which this one is not. > > Christophe I agree (even though I already acked the patch) Jonathon
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel