Hi, On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 07:08:55AM -0400, Frediano Ziglio wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 08:44:53AM +0200, Pavel Grunt wrote: > > > Hi Frediano! > > > > > > Thank you for looking into it > > > > > > imho it is confusing to document spice-protocol which is defined in > > > spice-common in spice server git repository. > > > > > > ^ that sentence is strange > > > > > > I know the documentation files are in the spice server git repo, imo > > > it is wrong. > > > > > > I would put this kind of information on our website, so it is easy to > > > give the reference to a "rendered" document in case somebody asks on > > > irc or by an email. > > > > I disagree on having the documentation _only_ in the website. IMHO, the > > website should be updated every release or so, with the generated > > documentation at that given release. > > > > If we should have the documentation in one of our repos, I would prefer > > that we keep it spice server. > > > > Just to make it clear... do you mean spice-server repository? Yes. We already have the (old) docs there and I don't see a reason to move it to protocol/common/website git... > > > > > > > Of course any documentation is better than no documentation. > > > > Indeed > > > > > > > > Pavel > > > > > Frediano
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Spice-devel mailing list Spice-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/spice-devel